lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:39:50 -0800
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, colyli@...e.de, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/7] lib: add rocksoft model crc64

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:10:38PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:01:03AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Since this model reflects inputs and outputs, a helper table and
> > function are added to reverse bits of 8 and 64 bit values.
> 
> That's a silly way to do a bit-reflected CRC.  The proper way to do it is to
> reflect the bytes too, so that the bits and bytes are ordered consistently, so
> explicitly reflecting the bits isn't needed.  Most CRC-32's are bit-reflected,
> and they are usually implemented this way.  E.g., see crc32_le() in lib/crc32.c.
> 
> Here's a Python script that shows that the Rocksoft CRC-64 can be computed
> without explicitly reversing the bits.  It passes the tests from your patch 4:

Thanks for the tip! I'll use that for the next version.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ