[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0ecfe37-b8f8-c6f8-49d7-0bdbc2bde47e@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:18:42 +0530
From: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@...cinc.com>
To: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"thara.gopinath@...aro.org" <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
"mka@...omium.org" <mka@...omium.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"amitk@...nel.org" <amitk@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal/core: Clear all mitigation when thermal zone
is disabled
HI Daniel,
On 1/24/2022 6:35 AM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 21:51 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Hi Manaf,
>>
>> semantically speaking disabling a thermal zone would be to detach the
>> thermal zone from its governor and stop the monitoring.
>>
>> May be add the functions
>>
>> - thermal_governor_attach(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd)
>> {
>> ...
>> if (tz->governor && tz->governor->bind_to_tz) {
>> if (tz->governor->bind_to_tz(tz)) {
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> - thermal_governor_detach(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd)
>> {
>> ...
>> if (tz->governor && tz->governor->unbind_from_tz)
>> tz->governor->unbind_from_tz(tz);
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> And add in the step_wise and power_allocator the reset of the
>> governor's
>> data as well as the cooling device instances in the unbind_from_tz()
>> callback
>>
>> Then, thermal_zone_device_enable() attaches and
>> thermal_zone_device_disable() detaches the governor.
>>
>> Does it make sense ?
> This is better.
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
Yes, it makes sense. I will update it in v4
>
>>
>> On 07/01/2022 19:56, Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi wrote:
>>> Whenever a thermal zone is in trip violated state, there is a
>>> chance
>>> that the same thermal zone mode can be disabled either via thermal
>>> core API or via thermal zone sysfs. Once it is disabled, the
>>> framework
>>> bails out any re-evaluation of thermal zone. It leads to a case
>>> where
>>> if it is already in mitigation state, it will stay the same state
>>> until it is re-enabled.
>>>
>>> To avoid above mentioned issue, on thermal zone disable request
>>> reset thermal zone and clear mitigation for each trip explicitly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi
>>> <quic_manafm@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>>> b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>>> index 51374f4..e288c82 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>>> @@ -447,10 +447,18 @@ static int
>>> thermal_zone_device_set_mode(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>>>
>>> thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
>>>
>>> - if (mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED)
>>> + if (mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED) {
>>> thermal_notify_tz_enable(tz->id);
>>> - else
>>> + } else {
>>> + int trip;
>>> +
>>> + /* make sure all previous throttlings are cleared
>>> */
>>> + thermal_zone_device_init(tz);
>>> + for (trip = 0; trip < tz->trips; trip++)
>>> + handle_thermal_trip(tz, trip);
>>> +
>>> thermal_notify_tz_disable(tz->id);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists