[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04698792-95b8-f5b6-5b2c-375806626de6@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 23:19:00 +0530
From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] KVM: SVM: Implement demand page pinning
Hi Peter
On 1/25/2022 10:17 PM, Peter Gonda wrote:
>> @@ -1637,8 +1627,6 @@ static void sev_migrate_from(struct kvm_sev_info *dst,
>> src->handle = 0;
>> src->pages_locked = 0;
>> src->enc_context_owner = NULL;
>> -
>> - list_cut_before(&dst->regions_list, &src->regions_list, &src->regions_list);
> I think we need to move the pinned SPTE entries into the target, and
> repin the pages in the target here. Otherwise the pages will be
> unpinned when the source is cleaned up. Have you thought about how
> this could be done?
>
I am testing migration with pinned_list, I see that all the guest pages are
transferred/pinned on the other side during migration. I think that there is
assumption that all private pages needs to be moved.
QEMU: target/i386/sev.c:bool sev_is_gfn_in_unshared_region(unsigned long gfn)
Will dig more on this.
Regards
Nikunj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists