[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gzfJYG40UdJUncd=b1E=YfLKyUZafEDC0Ej=7OA6867w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 18:53:16 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Enable named interrupt smbus-alert for ACPI
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:04 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> > It looks good to me.
> >
> > If no one else has concerns regarding it, I'll queue it up for 5.18.
>
> I'd prefer this to go via I2C because it touches the I2C core. And SMBus
> alert is I2C material anyway :)
OK, so I've just sent an ACK for the first patch and you can go ahead.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists