linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 0646/1039] kunit: Dont crash if no parameters are generated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124184147.064749898@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:40:35 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0646/1039] kunit: Dont crash if no parameters are generated

From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 37dbb4c7c7442dbfc9b651e4ddd4afe30b26afc9 ]

It's possible that a parameterised test could end up with zero
parameters. At the moment, the test function will nevertheless be called
with NULL as the parameter. Instead, don't try to run the test code, and
just mark the test as SKIPped.

Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 lib/kunit/test.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 3bd741e50a2d3..f96498ede2cc5 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -504,16 +504,18 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 		struct kunit_result_stats param_stats = { 0 };
 		test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
 
-		if (test_case->generate_params) {
+		if (!test_case->generate_params) {
+			/* Non-parameterised test. */
+			kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
+			kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, test.status);
+		} else {
 			/* Get initial param. */
 			param_desc[0] = '\0';
 			test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
-		}
 
-		do {
-			kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
+			while (test.param_value) {
+				kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
 
-			if (test_case->generate_params) {
 				if (param_desc[0] == '\0') {
 					snprintf(param_desc, sizeof(param_desc),
 						 "param-%d", test.param_index);
@@ -530,11 +532,11 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 				param_desc[0] = '\0';
 				test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
 				test.param_index++;
-			}
 
-			kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, test.status);
+				kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, test.status);
+			}
+		}
 
-		} while (test.param_value);
 
 		kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats);
 
-- 
2.34.1