linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v3] block: introduce block_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrkvcnfxQqrAJosLZK_jOxErwGvn5VkLASNfut6_N-+0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:19:06 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:03 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:58:10 -0800
> Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Never mind. Other than the code restructure, I also found some data
> > structure (struct request) and function (blk_fill_rwbs) change. I
> > think I'd better rebase the patch to 5.17-rc1 then resubmit it. Since
> > there is no fundamental change to the patch, can I keep your
> > reviewed-by tag?
>
> Sure, but please Cc me.

Yeah, definitely. Thanks.

>
> -- Steve