[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ec24b9a-4b98-ca31-9862-4b2d2df4b50e@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:40:25 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@...itsu.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org,
aleksei.kodanev@...l-sw.com, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/zram: Adapt the situation that /dev/zram0
is being used
On 12/15/21 2:56 AM, Yang Xu wrote:
> On some linux distributions, if it used /dev/zram0 as default by zram-generate
> service, then this case will fail or report EBUSY.
>
> To fix this, use hot_add/hot_remove interface. Also, move module check code into
> zram_load from zram.sh. We can use /sys/class/zram-control to detect the
> module whether existed.
>
> After this patch, we still run case pass even /dev/zram0 is being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@...itsu.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram.sh | 16 +----
> tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram01.sh | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram_lib.sh | 75 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
This patch looks good to me. A few checkpatch warns to fix and also
it probably depends on the other two patches in this series.
Please fix and send v2 for all 3 patches.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists