linux-kernel - Re: fs/dlm/midcomms.c:913:22: sparse: sparse: restricted _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:35:20 -0500
From:   Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
        cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
        linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/dlm/midcomms.c:913:22: sparse: sparse: restricted __le32
 degrades to integer

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 5:14 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:36:55PM -0500, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:23 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:41:04PM -0500, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:36 PM Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:21 PM Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:46 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 01:41:52PM -0500, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I see also:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > fs/dlm/midcomms.c:213:1: sparse: sparse: symbol
> > > > > > > > '__srcu_struct_nodes_srcu' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why not just do this?  (Untested.  Maybe I don't understand?)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > > > > > > index cb1f4351e8ba..a164089abec4 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > > > > > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ struct srcu_struct {
> > > > > > >  #ifdef MODULE
> > > > > > >  # define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static)                                        \
> > > > > > >         is_static struct srcu_struct name;                              \
> > > > > > > -       struct srcu_struct * const __srcu_struct_##name                 \
> > > > > > > +       is_static struct srcu_struct * const __srcu_struct_##name       \
> > > > > > >                 __section("___srcu_struct_ptrs") = &name
> > > > > > >  #else
> > > > > > >  # define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static)                                        \
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried it and yes it will fix the issue and introduce another one
> > > > > > about "is_static struct srcu_struct * const __srcu_struct_##name" is
> > > > > > unused ("-Wunused-const-variable").
> > > > > > I added a __maybe_unused after the introduced is_static and it seems
> > > > > > to fix the introduced issue, now it compiles and sparse is happy. I am
> > > > > > not sure if this is the right fix?
> > > > >
> > > > > it is obviously unused, but it has something to do with
> > > > > "__section("___srcu_struct_ptrs")" and during module loading it, I
> > > > > suppose, srcu tries to access it to find whatever needs to be
> > > > > registered?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but if this is true then it can't be declared as static... and
> > > > we are at the beginning again.
> > >
> > > Welcome to my world!!!  ;-)
> > >
> > > More seriously, thank you for chasing this down.  But would it work to
> > > add a declaration just before?
> > >
> >
> > only if I add an "extern" in front of the declaration before, so it looks like:
> >
> > extern struct srcu_struct * const __srcu_struct_##name;
> >
> > (compile and sparse tested only)
>
> If that works for everyone, it seems worth persuing.
>
> One way to test this is as follows:
>
> 1.      Build a kernel with CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m.  Boot this and
>         type "modprobe rcutorture torture_type=srcu".
>
>         If you want to stop the torture test, type "rmmod rcutorture".
>
>         This will test DEFINE_SRCU() for the module case.
>

I tested this case, I still need to do the 2. case. Sorry I am quite
busy with something else, but I am still working on it.

Thanks.

- Alex