lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220124184154.086990808@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:44:06 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0857/1039] s390/mm: fix 2KB pgtable release race

From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>

commit c2c224932fd0ee6854d6ebfc8d059c2bcad86606 upstream.

There is a race on concurrent 2KB-pgtables release paths when
both upper and lower halves of the containing parent page are
freed, one via page_table_free_rcu() + __tlb_remove_table(),
and the other via page_table_free(). The race might lead to a
corruption as result of remove of list item in page_table_free()
concurrently with __free_page() in __tlb_remove_table().

Let's assume first the lower and next the upper 2KB-pgtables are
freed from a page. Since both halves of the page are allocated
the tracking byte (bits 24-31 of the page _refcount) has value
of 0x03 initially:

CPU0				CPU1
----				----

page_table_free_rcu() // lower half
{
	// _refcount[31..24] == 0x03
	...
	atomic_xor_bits(&page->_refcount,
			0x11U << (0 + 24));
	// _refcount[31..24] <= 0x12
	...
	table = table | (1U << 0);
	tlb_remove_table(tlb, table);
}
...
__tlb_remove_table()
{
	// _refcount[31..24] == 0x12
	mask = _table & 3;
	// mask <= 0x01
	...

				page_table_free() // upper half
				{
					// _refcount[31..24] == 0x12
					...
					atomic_xor_bits(
						&page->_refcount,
						1U << (1 + 24));
					// _refcount[31..24] <= 0x10
					// mask <= 0x10
					...
	atomic_xor_bits(&page->_refcount,
			mask << (4 + 24));
	// _refcount[31..24] <= 0x00
	// mask <= 0x00
	...
	if (mask != 0) // == false
		break;
	fallthrough;
	...
					if (mask & 3) // == false
						...
					else
	__free_page(page);			list_del(&page->lru);
	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^	RACE!		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
}					...
				}

The problem is page_table_free() releases the page as result of
lower nibble unset and __tlb_remove_table() observing zero too
early. With this update page_table_free() will use the similar
logic as page_table_free_rcu() + __tlb_remove_table(), and mark
the fragment as pending for removal in the upper nibble until
after the list_del().

In other words, the parent page is considered as unreferenced and
safe to release only when the lower nibble is cleared already and
unsetting a bit in upper nibble results in that nibble turned zero.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
@@ -244,13 +244,15 @@ void page_table_free(struct mm_struct *m
 		/* Free 2K page table fragment of a 4K page */
 		bit = ((unsigned long) table & ~PAGE_MASK)/(PTRS_PER_PTE*sizeof(pte_t));
 		spin_lock_bh(&mm->context.lock);
-		mask = atomic_xor_bits(&page->_refcount, 1U << (bit + 24));
+		mask = atomic_xor_bits(&page->_refcount, 0x11U << (bit + 24));
 		mask >>= 24;
 		if (mask & 3)
 			list_add(&page->lru, &mm->context.pgtable_list);
 		else
 			list_del(&page->lru);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&mm->context.lock);
+		mask = atomic_xor_bits(&page->_refcount, 0x10U << (bit + 24));
+		mask >>= 24;
 		if (mask != 0)
 			return;
 	} else {


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ