linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 629/846] i2c: i801: Dont silently correct invalid transfer size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124184122.734921413@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:42:26 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 629/846] i2c: i801: Dont silently correct invalid transfer size

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit effa453168a7eeb8a562ff4edc1dbf9067360a61 ]

If an invalid block size is provided, reject it instead of silently
changing it to a supported value. Especially critical I see the case of
a write transfer with block length 0. In this case we have no guarantee
that the byte we would write is valid. When silently reducing a read to
32 bytes then we don't return an error and the caller may falsely
assume that we returned the full requested data.

If this change should break any (broken) caller, then I think we should
fix the caller.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
index 1f929e6c30bea..98e39a17fb830 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
@@ -763,6 +763,11 @@ static int i801_block_transaction(struct i801_priv *priv, union i2c_smbus_data *
 	int result = 0;
 	unsigned char hostc;
 
+	if (read_write == I2C_SMBUS_READ && command == I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA)
+		data->block[0] = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
+	else if (data->block[0] < 1 || data->block[0] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
+		return -EPROTO;
+
 	if (command == I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA) {
 		if (read_write == I2C_SMBUS_WRITE) {
 			/* set I2C_EN bit in configuration register */
@@ -776,16 +781,6 @@ static int i801_block_transaction(struct i801_priv *priv, union i2c_smbus_data *
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (read_write == I2C_SMBUS_WRITE
-	 || command == I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA) {
-		if (data->block[0] < 1)
-			data->block[0] = 1;
-		if (data->block[0] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
-			data->block[0] = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
-	} else {
-		data->block[0] = 32;	/* max for SMBus block reads */
-	}
-
 	/* Experience has shown that the block buffer can only be used for
 	   SMBus (not I2C) block transactions, even though the datasheet
 	   doesn't mention this limitation. */
-- 
2.34.1