linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220125084353.5fc682d9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:43:53 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h

between commit:

  be80a1d3f9db ("bpf: Generalize check_ctx_reg for reuse with other types")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  d583691c47dc ("bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e9993172f892,ac4797155412..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@@ -519,8 -519,10 +519,10 @@@ bpf_prog_offload_replace_insn(struct bp
  void
  bpf_prog_offload_remove_insns(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 cnt);
  
 -int check_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 -		  const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno);
 +int check_ptr_off_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 +		      const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno);
+ int check_kfunc_mem_size_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ 			     u32 regno);
  int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
  		   u32 regno, u32 mem_size);
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped