[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220124184159.173240015@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:46:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 1008/1039] net: fix sock_timestamping_bind_phc() to release device
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
commit 2a4d75bfe41232608f5596a6d1369f92ccb20817 upstream.
Don't forget to release the device in sock_timestamping_bind_phc() after
it was used to get the vclock indices.
Fixes: d463126e23f1 ("net: sock: extend SO_TIMESTAMPING for PHC binding")
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/sock.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -843,6 +843,8 @@ static int sock_timestamping_bind_phc(st
}
num = ethtool_get_phc_vclocks(dev, &vclock_index);
+ dev_put(dev);
+
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
if (*(vclock_index + i) == phc_index) {
match = true;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists