linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/7] iommu cleanup and refactoring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:11:55 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Eric Auger" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/7] iommu cleanup and refactoring

> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 1:44 AM
> 
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:46:26AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
> > > iommu subtree. As we have reached a consensus that all these features
> > > should be based on the new iommufd framework (which is under active
> > > development), the first part of this series removes and cleanups all
> > > the dead code.
> > >
> > > The second part of this series refactors the iommu_domain by moving all
> > > domain-specific ops from iommu_ops to a new domain_ops. This makes
> an
> > > iommu_domain self-contained and represent the abstraction of an I/O
> > > translation table in the IOMMU subsystem. With different type of
> > > iommu_domain providing different set of ops, it's easier to support more
> > > types of I/O translation tables.
> >
> > You may want to give more background on this end goal. In general there
> > are four IOPT types in iommufd discussions:
> >
> > 1) The one currently tracked by iommu_domain, with a map/unmap
> semantics
> > 2) The one managed by mm and shared to iommu via sva_bind/unbind ops
> > 3) The one managed by userspace and bound to iommu via iommufd
> (require nesting)
> > 4) The one managed by KVM (e.g. EPT) and shared to iommu via a TBD
> interface
> 
> Yes, at least from an iommufd perspective I'd like to see one struct
> for all of these types, mainly so we can have a uniform alloc, attach
> and detatch flow for all io page table types.
> 
> If we want to use the iommu_domain, or make iommu_domain a sub-class
> of a new struct, can be determined as we go along.
> 
> Regardless, I think this cleanup stands on its own. Moving the ops and
> purging the dead code is clearly the right thing to do.
> 

Indeed!