[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL3fHXNdGS=ap6+5Y25T2zmnDYRkt5dNV9mW7hyanVvuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:31:40 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: unittest: rename overlay source files from .dts
to .dtso
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:25 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:10 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:23 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Patient Geert has pinged again.
> >
> > If it's not a patch to be reviewed, then I'm not going to see it most
> > likely. I don't read the DT list regularly...
>
> Fair enough...
>
> > > If I remember correctly you guys were not thrilled with this idea, but
> > > also did not seem strongly against it. Are you willing to go along
> > > with .dtso for overlay source files? If so, I will revive this patch
> > > series.
> > >
> > > David, if you are against supporting .dtso in the dtc compiler then
> > > the kernel can still support it through make rules.
> >
> > I'm not really interested in diverging from dtc. I'd suggest moving
> > the discussion to dtc list and/or devicetree-spec if you want to get
> > more attention on this.
>
> What needs to be supported in the dtc compiler?
> The fallback passed to guess_input_format() is "dts".
> So this has been working out-of-the-box since forever?
Ah, okay.
> > Also, keep in mind that extensions also affect MIME types which
> > someone was also asking about recently.
>
> You mean "MIME type of Devicetree Blobs and Sources"[1]?
> According to [2](2022-01-13), none of that has happened.
This is what I was thinking of:
https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/issues/46
In any case, given everyone is ambivalent, send me an updated patch
and I'll apply it.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists