lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220126023418.p5m52qqqvhlek3nr@revolver>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jan 2022 02:34:24 +0000
From:   Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC:     "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken.cr@...il.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 54/66] mm/memcontrol: Stop using mm->highest_vm_end

* Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> [220120 06:21]:
> On 12/1/21 15:30, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 781605e92015..ac95b3eca557 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -5808,7 +5808,7 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_count_precharge(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  	unsigned long precharge;
> >  
> >  	mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > -	walk_page_range(mm, 0, mm->highest_vm_end, &precharge_walk_ops, NULL);
> > +	walk_page_range(mm, 0, -1, &precharge_walk_ops, NULL);
> 
> Wouldn't ULONG_MAX look better?

Sure, I'm happy enough to use ULONG_MAX.

> 
> >  	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> >  
> >  	precharge = mc.precharge;
> > @@ -6106,9 +6106,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_move_charge(void)
> >  	 * When we have consumed all precharges and failed in doing
> >  	 * additional charge, the page walk just aborts.
> >  	 */
> > -	walk_page_range(mc.mm, 0, mc.mm->highest_vm_end, &charge_walk_ops,
> > -			NULL);
> > -
> > +	walk_page_range(mc.mm, 0, -1, &charge_walk_ops, NULL);
> >  	mmap_read_unlock(mc.mm);
> >  	atomic_dec(&mc.from->moving_account);
> >  }
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ