[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADxym3aFJcsz=fckaFx9SJh8B7=0Xv-EPz79bbUFW1wG_zNYbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:43:42 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, alobakin@...me,
paulb@...dia.com, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
talalahmad@...gle.com, haokexin@...il.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, memxor@...il.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: udp: use kfree_skb_reason() in udp_queue_rcv_one_skb()
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:25 AM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/24/22 6:15 AM, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > index 603f77ef2170..dd64a4f2ff1d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ enum skb_drop_reason {
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_UNICAST_IN_L2_MULTICAST,
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY,
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_NOPROTO,
> > + SKB_DROP_REASON_UDP_FILTER,
>
> Is there really a need for a UDP and TCP version? why not just:
>
> /* dropped due to bpf filter on socket */
> SKB_DROP_REASON_SOCKET_FILTER
>
I realized it, but SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_FILTER was already
introduced before. Besides, I think maybe
a SKB_DROP_REASON_L4_CSUM is enough for UDP/TCP/ICMP
checksum error?
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX,
> > };
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists