[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+fCnZe_p+JwUWwumgGm185vWSdAK_z-UFDp7-HWKANB4YjA=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 23:12:41 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: raw-gadget: fix handling of dual-direction-capable endpoints
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:52 PM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Under dummy_hcd, every available endpoint is *either* IN or OUT capable.
> But with some real hardware, there are endpoints that support both IN and
> OUT. In particular, the PLX 2380 has four available endpoints that each
> support both IN and OUT.
>
> raw-gadget currently gets confused and thinks that any endpoint that is
> usable as an IN endpoint can never be used as an OUT endpoint.
>
> Fix it by looking at the direction in the configured endpoint descriptor
> instead of looking at the hardware capabilities.
>
> With this change, I can use the PLX 2380 with raw-gadget.
>
> Fixes: f2c2e717642c ("usb: gadget: add raw-gadget interface")
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c
> index c5a2c734234a..d86c3a36441e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw_gadget.c
> @@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int raw_process_ep_io(struct raw_dev *dev, struct usb_raw_ep_io *io,
> ret = -EBUSY;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> - if ((in && !ep->ep->caps.dir_in) || (!in && ep->ep->caps.dir_in)) {
> + if (in != usb_endpoint_dir_in(ep->ep->desc)) {
> dev_dbg(&dev->gadget->dev, "fail, wrong direction\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out_unlock;
>
> base-commit: 0280e3c58f92b2fe0e8fbbdf8d386449168de4a8
> --
> 2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
>
Awesome! Thanks for finding this!
What do you think about using
if ((in && !ep->ep->caps.dir_in) || (!in && !ep->ep->caps.dir_out))
instead?
It looks less cryptic: if (in and no in caps) or (out and no out caps) => fail.
FTR, I tested both changes with the net2280 hardware that I have, and
they work. At least gadget.c from the test suite enumerates properly.
Most of the tests still fail. But with g_zero, even more of them fail.
P.S. I wonder why everyone suddenly got interested in Raw Gadget lately? :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists