[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADxym3ZJ14sXYVzoecQ97uqyuy_+N+mwjjh0x8Hyy_o7XTVCpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:38:29 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: drop_monitor: support drop reason
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:38 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:59:55 +0800 menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> > @@ -606,6 +608,7 @@ static int net_dm_packet_report_in_port_put(struct sk_buff *msg, int ifindex,
> > static int net_dm_packet_report_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > size_t payload_len)
> > {
> > + enum skb_drop_reason reason = NET_DM_SKB_CB(skb)->reason;
> > u64 pc = (u64)(uintptr_t) NET_DM_SKB_CB(skb)->pc;
>
> nit: maybe it's better to get a pointer to struct net_dm_skb_cb here
> instead of local var for each field?
Yeah, I think it's a good idea :/
>
> > char buf[NET_DM_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN];
> > struct nlattr *attr;
> > @@ -623,6 +626,9 @@ static int net_dm_packet_report_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, NET_DM_ATTR_PC, pc, NET_DM_ATTR_PAD))
> > goto nla_put_failure;
> >
> > + if (nla_put_u32(msg, NET_DM_ATTR_REASON, reason))
> > + goto nla_put_failure;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists