linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the samsung-krzk tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPcP0ZZrmNg2X5k8WOgDqJdpOsX3dTe_DgdimPrAgh=j0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:08:07 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the samsung-krzk tree

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 23:33, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Commits
>
>   1f22c720691e ("Revert "arm64: dts: fsd: Add initial device tree support"")
>   191448a71471 ("Revert "arm64: dts: fsd: Add initial pinctrl support"")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their author and committer.
>
> Reverts are changes too and so should be signed off and have reasonable
> ("why did we do this?") changelogs.

Yes, you're right. I am dropping the commits (with reverts) but was
too late yesterday. I'll fix it today.

Best regards,
Krzysztof