[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220126083010.g7cw77wcliydh3im@viti.kaiser.cx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:30:10 +0100
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: r8188eu: ODM_RF_CALIBRATION is always set
Hi Dan,
Thus wrote Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@...cle.com):
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 06:05:46PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > @@ -36,10 +35,6 @@ static void Init_ODM_ComInfo_88E(struct adapter *Adapter)
> > ODM_CmnInfoInit(dm_odm, ODM_CMNINFO_MP_TEST_CHIP, IS_NORMAL_CHIP(hal_data->VersionID));
> > ODM_CmnInfoInit(dm_odm, ODM_CMNINFO_RF_ANTENNA_TYPE, hal_data->TRxAntDivType);
> > -
> > - pdmpriv->InitODMFlag = ODM_RF_CALIBRATION;
> > -
> > - ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(dm_odm, ODM_CMNINFO_ABILITY, pdmpriv->InitODMFlag);
> Wait, why did you remove the ODM_CmnInfoUpdate()?
I removed the last item that Init_ODM_ComInfo_88E added to
pdmpriv->InitODMFlag. Init_ODM_ComInfo_88E does no longer modify
pdmpriv->InitODMFlag, there's no need for updating the odm internal
status.
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists