[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220126091104.jbedxrewojcmvy3u@wittgenstein>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:11:04 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
serge@...lyn.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
containers@...ts.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com,
roberto.sassu@...wei.com, mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com,
lsturman@...hat.com, puiterwi@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
jamjoom@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/23] ima: Move arch_policy_entry into ima_namespace
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:46:28PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Move the arch_policy_entry pointer into ima_namespace.
>
> When freeing the memory set the pointer to NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
Only relevant for the initial imans (for now) since it is derived from a
boot parameter. Maybe mention this in the commit message.
Move into struct ima_namespace looks good,
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists