[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220126103316.GA212068@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:03:16 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mdalam@...eaurora.org,
sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: qcom_nandc: Don't clear_bam_transaction
on READID
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> miquel.raynal@...tlin.com wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:27:18 +0100:
>
> > Hi Konrad,
> >
> > konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:44:26 +0100:
> >
> > > While I have absolutely 0 idea why and how, running clear_bam_transaction
> > > when READID is issued makes the DMA totally clog up and refuse to function
> > > at all on mdm9607. In fact, it is so bad that all the data gets garbled
> > > and after a short while in the nand probe flow, the CPU decides that
> > > sepuku is the only option.
> > >
> > > Removing _READID from the if condition makes it work like a charm, I can
> > > read data and mount partitions without a problem.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
> > > ---
> > > This is totally just an observation which took me an inhumane amount of
> > > debug prints to find.. perhaps there's a better reason behind this, but
> > > I can't seem to find any answers.. Therefore, this is a BIG RFC!
> >
> > I'm adding two people from codeaurora who worked a lot on this driver.
> > Hopefully they will have an idea :)
>
> Sadre, I've spent a significant amount of time reviewing your patches,
> now it's your turn to not take a month to answer to your peers
> proposals.
>
> Please help reviewing this patch.
>
Sorry. I was hoping that Qcom folks would chime in as I don't have any idea
about the mdm9607 platform. It could be that the mail server migration from
codeaurora to quicinc put a barrier here.
Let me ping them internally.
> BTW why is this driver still using cmdfund? It should have been
> migrated to ->exec_op() a long time ago.
I'll look into it.
Thanks,
Mani
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists