[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfE7T7gl+0GrlFt/@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:15:11 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Cc: Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>,
Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/11] drm: Convert open-coded yes/no
strings to yesno()
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:43:45AM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:12:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:39 AM Lucas De Marchi
> > <lucas.demarchi@...el.com> wrote:
...
> > > 411986 10490 6176 428652 68a6c drm.ko.old
> > > 411986 10490 6176 428652 68a6c drm.ko
> > > 98129 1636 264 100029 186bd dp/drm_dp_helper.ko.old
> > > 98129 1636 264 100029 186bd dp/drm_dp_helper.ko
> > > 1973432 109640 2352 2085424 1fd230 nouveau/nouveau.ko.old
> > > 1973432 109640 2352 2085424 1fd230 nouveau/nouveau.ko
> >
> > This probably won't change for modules, but if you compile in the
> > linker may try to optimize it. Would be nice to see the old-new for
> > `make allyesconfig` or equivalent.
>
> just like it would already do, no? I can try and see what happens, but
> my feeling is that we won't have any change.
Maybe not or maybe a small win. Depends how compiler puts / linker sees
that in two cases. (Yeah, likely it should be no differences if all
instances are already caught by linker)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists