linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/e820: Tag e820

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKgze5ba429M=Aad9qBNL+CZLCVF09LQ6ZwXCT2jc86vDggp6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:03:50 -0300
From:   Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@...ypsium.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, daniel.gutson@...ypsium.com,
        hughsient@...il.com, alex.bazhaniuk@...ypsium.com,
        alison.schofield@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry with crypto capabilities

> On 1/14/22, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>> On 1/13/22 1:30 PM, Martin Fernandez wrote:
>>> +/*
>>> + * Update crypto capabilities in a range
>>> + */
>>> +static u64 __init __e820__range_update_crypto(struct e820_table *table,
>>> +					      u64 start, u64 size,
>>> +					      enum e820_crypto_capabilities crypto_capable)
>>
>> This looks like an almost pure copy-and-paste of a 70-line function.
>> That's not the end of the world, but it does seem like a place where
>> refactoring is in order.

Introducing a for_each to iterate over the table is one of the
improvements I'm thinking of. Do you think it's a good idea to
introduce it in this patch (changing all the relevant for loops for
this new for_each) or should I do it in a separate patch?