[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220127162636.3461256-1-shakeelb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:26:36 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: replace in_interrupt() with !in_task()
Replace the deprecated in_interrupt() with !in_task() because
in_interrupt() returns true for BH disabled even if the call happens in
the task context. in_task() is the right interface to differentiate
task context from NMI, hard IRQ and softirq contexts.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d067366002e6..215dfe325e9d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2688,7 +2688,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.high);
/* Don't bother a random interrupted task */
- if (in_interrupt()) {
+ if (!in_task()) {
if (mem_high) {
schedule_work(&memcg->high_work);
break;
@@ -6968,7 +6968,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk)
return;
/* Do not associate the sock with unrelated interrupted task's memcg. */
- if (in_interrupt())
+ if (!in_task())
return;
rcu_read_lock();
--
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists