linux-kernel - Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:41:38 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ardb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with
 code-patching selftests

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:46:49AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> I'm not sure how x86 works here; AFAICT the relocations are performed during
> decompression, but it looks like there's some special build-time processing
> associated with that, and the vmlinux doesn't contain standard ELF relocations.
> 
> Kees, IIUC you added the x86_64 support there, can you shed any light on if/how
> this works on x86?

I think Sven beat me to it, and this was answered in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/yt9dy231gzae.fsf@linux.ibm.com
but let me know if anything needs further info.

An additional note is that x86 is built with "-2G addressing"
(-mcmodel=kernel). There was some work done to make it actually
PIE, which would allow the KASLR base to move further:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/38

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook