[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73464511fcf942389f51095936942b2c@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:52:43 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa
<smita.koralahallichannabasappa@....com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/cpu: Merge Intel and AMD ppin_init() functions
>> + [X86_VENDOR_AMD] = {
>> + .feature = X86_FEATURE_AMD_PPIN,
>> + .msr_ppin_ctl = MSR_AMD_PPIN_CTL,
>> + .msr_ppin = MSR_AMD_PPIN
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> You forgot to rebuild after removing that guy here in the struct
> definition. I'll fix it up now so that I can continue going through them
> but pls fix in the next submission so that all patches build separately.
Oops. Sorry. Yes. I will move those initializations out of this patch
and into the later patch when the .msr_ppin field is added.
I'll wait on posting v3 until you finish with the rest of v2.
Thanks
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists