[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfLQYa5aKJKs7ZUe@shikoro>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:03:29 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] genirq: Provide generic_handle_irq_safe().
Hi Sebastian,
> +/**
> + * generic_handle_irq_safe - Invoke the handler for a particular irq
This is the same desc as for generic_handle_irq(). I suggest to add
something like "from any context" to have some distinction.
> + * This function must be called either from an IRQ context with irq regs
> + * initialized or with care from any context.
I think "with care" is not obvious enough. Can you describe it a little?
Thanks for this work,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists