linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfLorAvvQJO5uhL5@geo.homenetwork>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:47:08 +0800
From:   Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        pjt@...gle.com, posk@...gle.com, avagin@...gle.com,
        jannh@...gle.com, tdelisle@...terloo.ca, mark.rutland@....com,
        posk@...k.io, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:25:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> 
> > > +/* Called from syscall exit path and exceptions that can schedule */
> > > +void umcg_sys_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> > > +	long syscall = syscall_get_nr(tsk, regs);
> > > +
> > > +	if (syscall == __NR_umcg_wait ||
> > > +	    syscall == __NR_umcg_ctl)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	if (tsk->umcg_server) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Didn't block, we done.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		umcg_unpin_pages();
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	umcg_unblock_and_wait();
> > 
> > umcg_unblock_and_wait() -> umcg_enqueue_and_wake() ->
> > umcg_wake_server() -> umcg_wake_task(tsk->umcg_server, ...)
> > 
> > tsk->umcg_server is NULL here and umcg_wake_task() use it to update
> > state in umcg_update_state(NULL, ...), that means tsk->umcg_clock
> > will happen something i do not know.
> 
> I think umcg_unblock_and_wait() will repin, at which point we should
> have tsk->umcg_server again.

That's right, I miss that.

> > There are two places to call umcg_unblock_and_wait(). One is in 
> > umcg_register() where the server is set. Another one is in
> > umcg_sys_exit() where the server is not set. May use a bool to
> > indicate if the server is set.
> 
> I'm not sure what you're on about, but I absolutely hate redundant
> state, that only leads to problems.


But, it's my noise though.