[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkx4u_+hPNNdmN23g58RprqkcUfhoPeZhu578DKU0qJ_hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:26:26 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Suzuki.Poulose@....com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
leo.yan@...aro.com, mike.leach@...aro.org,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] coresight: Add config flag to enable branch broadcast
Hi James,
I am seriously back-logged in my patch reviews and as such will not be
able to get to your work in the usual 14 days. At this time and if
everything goes well, I should be able to start reviewing this
patchset during the week of February 7th.
Thanks,
Mathieu
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 02:11, James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>
> This allows enabling branch broadcast for Perf hosted sessions (the option
> is currently only available for the sysfs interface). Hopefully this could
> be useful for testing the decode in perf, for example does a determinisitic
> run with branch broadcast enabled look the same as with it disabled? It
> could also be used for scenarios like OpenJ9's support for JIT code:
>
> java -Xjit:perfTool hello.java
>
> Currently this is not working and you get the usual errors of a missing
> DSO, but branch broadcast would have to be enabled anyway before working
> through this next issue:
>
> CS ETM Trace: Debug data not found for address 0xffff7b94b058 in /tmp/perf-29360.map
>
> Address range support in Perf for branch broadcast has also not been added
> here, but could be added later.
>
> The documentation has been refactored slightly to allow updates to be made
> that link the Perf format arguments with the existing documentation.
>
> For Suzuki's comment, I will do it as a separate change that converts all
> the other hard coded values to a more consistent sysreg.h style:
>
> nit: While at this, please could you change the hard coded value
> to ETM4_CFG_BIT_RETSTK ?
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> * Added Leo's reviewed by on patch 3
> * Fix bracket styling
> * Add documentation
>
> Applies on top of coresight/next efa56eddf5d5c. But this docs fix is also
> required to get the links to work:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-doc&m=164139331923986&w=2
>
> Also available at: https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jc/-/tree/james-branch-broadcast-v2
>
> James Clark (6):
> coresight: Add config flag to enable branch broadcast
> coresight: Fail to open with return stacks if they are unavailable
> perf cs-etm: Update deduction of TRCCONFIGR register for branch
> broadcast
> Documentation: coresight: Turn numbered subsections into real
> subsections
> Documentation: coresight: Link config options to existing
> documentation
> Documentation: coresight: Expand branch broadcast documentation
>
> .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-reference.rst | 14 ++++-
> Documentation/trace/coresight/coresight.rst | 56 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 2 +
> .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 23 ++++++--
> include/linux/coresight-pmu.h | 2 +
> tools/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h | 2 +
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 3 +
> 7 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists