linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 08/24] EDAC/amd64: Define function to check DRAM limit address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220127204115.384161-9-yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:40:59 +0000
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <mchehab@...nel.org>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <james.morse@....com>,
        <rric@...nel.org>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/24] EDAC/amd64: Define function to check DRAM limit address

Move the DRAM limit check into a separate helper function.

Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
---
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211028175728.121452-13-yazen.ghannam@amd.com

v3->v4:
* Include pr_debug() on failure.

v2->v3:
* Was patch 13 in v2.

v1->v2:
* Moved from arch/x86 to EDAC.

 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index da2d0d9ce406..139dca3a3ba4 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -1326,10 +1326,20 @@ static int add_base_and_hole(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr(u64 norm_addr, u16 nid, u8 umc, u64 *sys_addr)
+static int addr_over_limit(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	u64 dram_limit_addr;
+	u64 dram_limit_addr  = ((ctx->reg_limit_addr & GENMASK_ULL(31, 12)) << 16)
+					| GENMASK_ULL(27, 0);
+
+	/* Is calculated system address above DRAM limit address? */
+	if (ctx->ret_addr > dram_limit_addr)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
+static int umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr(u64 norm_addr, u16 nid, u8 umc, u64 *sys_addr)
+{
 	struct addr_ctx ctx;
 
 	if (!df_ops) {
@@ -1365,8 +1375,6 @@ static int umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr(u64 norm_addr, u16 nid, u8 umc, u64 *sys_addr
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
-	dram_limit_addr	  = ((ctx.reg_limit_addr & GENMASK_ULL(31, 12)) << 16) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 0);
-
 	if (add_base_and_hole(&ctx)) {
 		pr_debug("Failed to add DRAM base address and hole");
 		goto out_err;
@@ -1377,9 +1385,10 @@ static int umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr(u64 norm_addr, u16 nid, u8 umc, u64 *sys_addr
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
-	/* Is calculated system address is above DRAM limit address? */
-	if (ctx.ret_addr > dram_limit_addr)
+	if (addr_over_limit(&ctx)) {
+		pr_debug("Calculated address is over limit");
 		goto out_err;
+	}
 
 	*sys_addr = ctx.ret_addr;
 	return 0;
-- 
2.25.1