[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfMFQ5IZiGBRw7SH@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 21:49:07 +0100
From: Paul Heidekrüger <paul.heidekrueger@...tum.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Charalampos Mainas <charalampos.mainas@...il.com>,
Pramod Bhatotia <pramod.bhatotia@...tum.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Clarify syntactic and semantic
dependencies
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:04:26PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:00:22PM +0100, Paul Heidekrüger wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 04:00:11PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > That's a very abstract way of describing the situation; it doesn't do a
> > > good job of getting the real idea across. It also mixes up two separate
> > > ideas: behaviors being unaffected by a syntactic dependency and
> > > behaviors being undefined. They should be described separately.
> >
> > Many thanks for the feedback! I agree, the explanation works a lot
> > better once readers have been introduced to data, addr and ctrl
> > relations.
> >
> > > I would prefer something along these lines...
> >
> > Shall I resubmit the patch with you as co-developer, or, given that it's
> > arguably your work now, would you like to submit the patch yourself?
>
> I'll submit it myself, with Suggested-by: you. How does that sound?
Sounds good!
Many thanks,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists