linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g46jxy96NdTJwrBdydaLvzFNP4tvCQVMLmTkt=+VjDiciQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:31:19 -0500
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     davidgow@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT macros

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:00 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> We currently have 2 other versions of KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT.
> The only differences are that
> * the format funcition they pass is different
> * the types of left_val/right_val should be different (integral,
> pointer, string).
>
> The latter doesn't actually matter since these macros are just plumbing
> them along to KUNIT_ASSERTION where they will get type checked.
>
> So combine them all into a single KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT that
> now also takes the format function as a parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>