linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] Remove bdi_congested() and wb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKFNMom4Z76ti4fp69UeKYf0d4x635OR7Q_CjVnBj+vQSuhESg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 07:10:11 +0900
From:   Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
        Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] Remove bdi_congested() and wb_congested() and related functions

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:47 AM NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
>
> These functions are no longer useful as the only bdis that report
> congestion are in ceph, fuse, and nfs.  None of those bdis can be the
> target of the calls in drbd, ext2, nilfs2, or xfs.
>
> Removing the test on bdi_write_contested() in current_may_throttle()
> could cause a small change in behaviour, but only when PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE
> is set.
>
> So replace the calls by 'false' and simplify the code - and remove the
> functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h |    3 ---
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c |    3 +--
>  fs/ext2/ialloc.c              |    2 --
>  fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c            |   11 -----------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c              |    3 ---
>  include/linux/backing-dev.h   |   26 --------------------------
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |    4 +---
>  7 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

for nilfs2 bits,

Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>

Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi