linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH davidhildenbrand] early_node_zone_for_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220127223014.GA44143@ca5a2f49b72c>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:30:15 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH davidhildenbrand] early_node_zone_for_memory_block() can
 be static

drivers/base/memory.c:648:13: warning: symbol 'early_node_zone_for_memory_block' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 176a3d535903 ("tmp")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
 memory.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index fa20ca42862f4..0b396e4c30667 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ int register_memory(struct memory_block *memory)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-struct zone *early_node_zone_for_memory_block(int nid, struct memory_block *mem)
+static struct zone *early_node_zone_for_memory_block(int nid, struct memory_block *mem)
 {
 	const unsigned long start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr);
 	const unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;