linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:37:58 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
cc:     kashyap.desai@...adcom.com, sumit.saxena@...adcom.com,
        shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid


On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, trix@...hat.com wrote:

> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> 
> checkpatch reports several hundred formatting errors. Run these files 
> through clang-format and knock off some of them.
> 

That method seems like a good recipe for endless churn unless checkpatch 
and clang-format really agree about these style rules.

Why use checkpatch to assess code style, if we could simply diff the 
existing source with the output from clang-format... but it seems that 
clang-format harms readability, makes indentation errors and uses 
inconsistent style rules. Some examples:

>  static unsigned short int max_sectors_per_io = MAX_SECTORS_PER_IO;
>  module_param(max_sectors_per_io, ushort, 0);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_sectors_per_io, "Maximum number of sectors per I/O request (default=MAX_SECTORS_PER_IO=128)");
> -
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(
> +	max_sectors_per_io,
> +	"Maximum number of sectors per I/O request (default=MAX_SECTORS_PER_IO=128)");
>  
>  static unsigned short int max_mbox_busy_wait = MBOX_BUSY_WAIT;
>  module_param(max_mbox_busy_wait, ushort, 0);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_mbox_busy_wait, "Maximum wait for mailbox in microseconds if busy (default=MBOX_BUSY_WAIT=10)");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(
> +	max_mbox_busy_wait,
> +	"Maximum wait for mailbox in microseconds if busy (default=MBOX_BUSY_WAIT=10)");
>  

This code is longer for no real improvement.

>  
>  /*
>   * The File Operations structure for the serial/ioctl interface of the driver
>   */
>  static const struct file_operations megadev_fops = {
> -	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> -	.unlocked_ioctl	= megadev_unlocked_ioctl,
> -	.open		= megadev_open,
> -	.llseek		= noop_llseek,
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl = megadev_unlocked_ioctl,
> +	.open = megadev_open,
> +	.llseek = noop_llseek,
>  };
>  
>  /*

Readability loss.

> -		prod_info_dma_handle = dma_map_single(&adapter->dev->dev,
> -						      (void *)&adapter->product_info,
> -						      sizeof(mega_product_info),
> -						      DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +		prod_info_dma_handle = dma_map_single(
> +			&adapter->dev->dev, (void *)&adapter->product_info,
> +			sizeof(mega_product_info), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  

Note the orphaned first parameter and odd indentation.

>  
>  static DEF_SCSI_QCMD(megaraid_queue)
>  
> -/**
> +	/**
>   * mega_allocate_scb()
>   * @adapter: pointer to our soft state
>   * @cmd: scsi command from the mid-layer

Indentation error.

> @@ -418,15 +409,14 @@ static DEF_SCSI_QCMD(megaraid_queue)
>   * Allocate a SCB structure. This is the central structure for controller
>   * commands.
>   */
> -static inline scb_t *
> -mega_allocate_scb(adapter_t *adapter, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> +	static inline scb_t *mega_allocate_scb(adapter_t *adapter,
> +					       struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  {
>  	struct list_head *head = &adapter->free_list;

Same.

> @@ -586,26 +568,25 @@ mega_build_cmd(adapter_t *adapter, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, int *busy)
>  
>  		ldrv_num = mega_get_ldrv_num(adapter, cmd, channel);
>  
> -
>  		max_ldrv_num = (adapter->flag & BOARD_40LD) ?
> -			MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_40LD : MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_8LD;
> +				       MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_40LD :
> +					     MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_8LD;
>  

Churn, if not readability loss. Note the indentation change here is 
inconsistent with the indentation change noted above.

>  			 * 6-byte READ(0x08) or WRITE(0x0A) cdb
>  			 */
> -			if( cmd->cmd_len == 6 ) {
> -				mbox->m_out.numsectors = (u32) cmd->cmnd[4];
> -				mbox->m_out.lba =
> -					((u32)cmd->cmnd[1] << 16) |
> -					((u32)cmd->cmnd[2] << 8) |
> -					(u32)cmd->cmnd[3];
> +			if (cmd->cmd_len == 6) {
> +				mbox->m_out.numsectors = (u32)cmd->cmnd[4];
> +				mbox->m_out.lba = ((u32)cmd->cmnd[1] << 16) |
> +						  ((u32)cmd->cmnd[2] << 8) |
> +						  (u32)cmd->cmnd[3];
>  
>  				mbox->m_out.lba &= 0x1FFFFF;
>  

Here, the orphaned term is moved up, next to the =. And yet,

>  
>  			/* Calculate Scatter-Gather info */
> -			mbox->m_out.numsgelements = mega_build_sglist(adapter, scb,
> -					(u32 *)&mbox->m_out.xferaddr, &seg);
> +			mbox->m_out.numsgelements =
> +				mega_build_sglist(adapter, scb,
> +						  (u32 *)&mbox->m_out.xferaddr,
> +						  &seg);
>  
>  			return scb;
>  

... here the first term is moved down and orphaned, which is another 
inconsistency.