linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:37:33 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT macros

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:36 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:00 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > We currently have 2 other versions of KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT.
> > The only differences are that
> > * the format funcition they pass is different
> Minor nit: s/funcition/function/
> > * the types of left_val/right_val should be different (integral,
> > pointer, string).
> >
> > The latter doesn't actually matter since these macros are just plumbing
> > them along to KUNIT_ASSERTION where they will get type checked.
> >
> > So combine them all into a single KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT that
> > now also takes the format function as a parameter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> > ---
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> One minor spelling nit: probably not worth a whole new version over,
> but if v2 ever happens, worth fixing at the same time...
>

Oops, forgot to add the Reviewed-by!

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

> -- David
>