[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <693d1cd2-36c3-96a1-b15f-dc7f42074376@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:00:46 -0800
From: Scott Bruce <smbruce@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 0000/1033] 5.16.3-rc2 review
On 1/25/22 08:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.3 release.
> There are 1033 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.3-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Build/boot/suspend all good on my x86-64/Cezanne laptop. I've run
through a bunch of suspend cycle tests on -rc1 and -rc2 to look for any
amd s0ix regressions and everything looks good.
Tested-by: Scott Bruce <smbruce@...il.com>
Cheers!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists