lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfInp7SsZNNgRfB7@T590>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:03:35 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, mkoutny@...e.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
        axboe@...nel.dk, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] block: cancel all throttled bios in del_gendisk()

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:45:33AM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
> 在 2022/01/27 1:03, Tejun Heo 写道:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:50:11AM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
> > > Both ways can fix the problem, which way do you prefer?
> > 
> > Ming's suggested change seems simpler, no?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, if Ming don't mind, I can send a new version after Ming's
> pathset "block: don't drain file system I/O on del_gendisk".

The patch of canceling throttled bios shouldn't be conflicted
with the above big patchset, and you can send it out now against
for-5.18/block.


Thanks,
Ming

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ