linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.16 0000/1033] 5.16.3-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfI4oDEY7W4lxWZP@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:16:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 0000/1033] 5.16.3-rc2 review

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:11:47PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> We didn't get the notification for this release candidate. Thanks for the heads up, Guenter!

Yes, as I responded to Guenter, no one did, that was a bug in my scripts
due to the size of this series :(

> On 1/25/22 10:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.3 release.
> > There are 1033 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.3-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.16.3-rc2
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-5.16.y
> * git commit: 39cb7e05eaf4fd55c6445fe8fe9ffa7f8d329205
> * git describe: v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4
> * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4
> 
> ## No test Regressions (compared to v5.16.2)
> 
> ## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.2)
> 
> ## No test Fixes (compared to v5.16.2)
> 
> ## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.2)
> 
> ## Test result summary
> total: 105828, pass: 89914, fail: 1186, skip: 13585, xfail: 1143
> 
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed
> * arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
> * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed
> * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed
> * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed
> * riscv: 28 total, 24 passed, 4 failed
> * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed
> * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
> * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
> * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed

<snip>

No Tested-by: line?