linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: build zonelist for managed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f23028db-a351-e6b0-6c17-f14191ab3985@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:39:56 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mhocko@...e.com
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: build zonelist for managed_zone

On 27.01.22 02:20, Wei Yang wrote:
> During memory hotplug, when online/offline a zone, we need to rebuild
> the zonelist for all node. There are two checks to decide whether a zone
> would be added to zonelist:
> 
>   * one in online_pages/offline_pages to decide necessity
>   * one in build_zonerefs_node to do real add
> 
> Currently we use different criteria at these two places, which is
> different from the original behavior.
> 
> Originally during memory hotplug, zonelist is re-built when zone hasn't
> been populated. This in introduced in 'commit 6811378e7d8b ("[PATCH]
> wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd: update zonelists")'.
> And at that moment, build_zonelists_node() also use populated_zone() to
> decide whether the zone should be added to zonelist.
> 
> While in 'commit 6aa303defb74 ("mm, vmscan: only allocate and reclaim
> from zones with pages managed by the buddy allocator")',
> build_zonelists_node() changed to use managed_zone() to add zonelist.
> But we still use populated_zone() to decide the necessity.
> 
> This patch restore the original behavior by using the same criteria to
> add a zone in zonelist during memory hotplug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
> Fixes: 6aa303defb74 ("mm, vmscan: only allocate and reclaim from zones with pages managed by the buddy allocator")
> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> ---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 2a9627dc784c..8f1906b33937 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1102,11 +1102,11 @@ int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If this zone is not populated, then it is not in zonelist.
> +	 * If this zone is not managed, then it is not in zonelist.
>  	 * This means the page allocator ignores this zone.
>  	 * So, zonelist must be updated after online.
>  	 */
> -	if (!populated_zone(zone)) {
> +	if (!managed_zone(zone)) {
>  		need_zonelists_rebuild = 1;
>  		setup_zone_pageset(zone);
>  	}
> @@ -1985,7 +1985,7 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	/* reinitialise watermarks and update pcp limits */
>  	init_per_zone_wmark_min();
>  
> -	if (!populated_zone(zone)) {
> +	if (!managed_zone(zone)) {
>  		zone_pcp_reset(zone);
>  		build_all_zonelists(NULL);
>  	}

A note that managed_zone() is a moving target w.r.t. memory ballooning.
In extreme cases, we can have whole zones (temporarily) be completely
!managed for that reason.

IMHO memory hot(un)plug is usually the wrong place to check for
managed_zone(), it cares about populated_zone().

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb