lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYt35cFuTWEP5-+Dq5K9ZzMQTd0OG679vQs+0+92EhHvmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:01:53 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <russell.king@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/846] 5.15.17-rc1 review

On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 21:05, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > Regressions detected on arm, arm64, i386, x86 on 5.15 and 5.10
> >
> > > >
> > > > This is one from arm64:
> > > >    /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c: In function 'fixup_exception':
> > > >    /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c:17:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_bpf_jit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > >       17 |         if (in_bpf_jit(regs))
> > > >          |             ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > >    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > >    make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:277: arch/arm64/mm/extable.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > Bisection here pointed to "arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs". Reverting made the build succeed.
> >
> > arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs
> > commit b89ddf4cca43f1269093942cf5c4e457fd45c335 upstream.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> This one needs slightly different handling on 5.15. Russell had a 5.15
> patch for this (where BPF exception handling was still handled separately)
> and I've included it below. I verified it applies cleanly to the
> linux-5.15.y branch and builds.  I'd suggest either skipping backport of
> this fix to stable completely, or just applying the below to 5.15 and
> skipping further backports.

Build test pass with this patch on stable/linux-5.15.y.
I have not run any tests.

- Naresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ