lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:16:31 +0100
From:   Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ardb@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with
 code-patching selftests

Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:46:01AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:27:04 +0000
>> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Ah, so those non-ELF relocations for the mcount_loc table just mean "apply the
>> > KASLR offset here", which is equivalent for all entries.
>> > 
>> > That makes sense, thanks!
>> 
>> And this is why we were having such a hard time understanding each other ;-)
>
> ;)
>
> With that in mind, I think that we understand that the build-time sort works
> for:
>
> * arch/x86, becuase the non-ELF relocations for mcount_loc happen to be
>   equivalent.
>  
> * arch/arm, because there's no dynamic relocaiton and the mcount_loc entries
>   have been finalized prior to sorting.
>
> ... but doesn't work for anyone else (including arm64) because the ELF
> relocations are not equivalent, and need special care that is not yet
> implemented.

For s390 my idea is to just skip the addresses between __start_mcount_loc
and __stop_mcount_loc, because for these addresses we know that they are
64 bits wide, so we just need to add the KASLR offset.

I'm thinking about something like this:

diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h b/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h
index f75cc31a77dd..015d7e2e94ef 100644
--- a/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/compressed/decompressor.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct vmlinux_info {
 	unsigned long rela_dyn_start;
 	unsigned long rela_dyn_end;
 	unsigned long amode31_size;
+	unsigned long start_mcount_loc;
+	unsigned long stop_mcount_loc;
 };
 
 /* Symbols defined by linker scripts */
diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/startup.c b/arch/s390/boot/startup.c
index 1aa11a8f57dd..7bb0d88db5c6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/boot/startup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/startup.c
@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ static void handle_relocs(unsigned long offset)
 	dynsym = (Elf64_Sym *) vmlinux.dynsym_start;
 	for (rela = rela_start; rela < rela_end; rela++) {
 		loc = rela->r_offset + offset;
+		if ((loc >= vmlinux.start_mcount_loc) &&
+		    (loc < vmlinux.stop_mcount_loc)) {
+			(*(unsigned long *)loc) += offset;
+			continue;
+		}
 		val = rela->r_addend;
 		r_sym = ELF64_R_SYM(rela->r_info);
 		if (r_sym) {
@@ -232,6 +237,8 @@ static void offset_vmlinux_info(unsigned long offset)
 	vmlinux.rela_dyn_start += offset;
 	vmlinux.rela_dyn_end += offset;
 	vmlinux.dynsym_start += offset;
+	vmlinux.start_mcount_loc += offset;
+	vmlinux.stop_mcount_loc += offset;
 }
 
 static unsigned long reserve_amode31(unsigned long safe_addr)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 42c43521878f..51c773405608 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ SECTIONS
 		QUAD(__rela_dyn_start)				/* rela_dyn_start */
 		QUAD(__rela_dyn_end)				/* rela_dyn_end */
 		QUAD(_eamode31 - _samode31)			/* amode31_size */
+		QUAD(__start_mcount_loc)
+		QUAD(__stop_mcount_loc)
 	} :NONE
 
 	/* Debugging sections.	*/

Not sure whether that would also work on power, and also not sure
whether i missed something thinking about that. Maybe it doesn't even
work. ;-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists