[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfKkkRNTA9qCmPTW@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:56:33 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mike.rapoport@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] tools/include: Update atomic.h header
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> Add atomic_long_t typedef and atomic_long_set function so they
> can be used in testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/include/linux/atomic.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/linux/atomic.h b/tools/include/linux/atomic.h
> index 00a6c4ca562b..5d2431889606 100644
> --- a/tools/include/linux/atomic.h
> +++ b/tools/include/linux/atomic.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@
>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>
> +typedef atomic_t atomic_long_t;
Given this:
typedef struct {
int counter;
} atomic_t;
your definition seems wrong. Why not add atomic_long_t to types.h,
adjacent to atomic_t?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists