linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] stack: Constrain stack offset randomization with Clang builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfQ8IwCSzbtAhC3B@dev-arch.archlinux-ax161>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:55:31 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] stack: Constrain stack offset randomization with
 Clang builds

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:44:46PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> All supported versions of Clang perform auto-init of __builtin_alloca()
> when stack auto-init is on (CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_{ZERO,PATTERN}).
> 
> add_random_kstack_offset() uses __builtin_alloca() to add a stack
> offset. This means, when CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_{ZERO,PATTERN} is
> enabled, add_random_kstack_offset() will auto-init that unused portion
> of the stack used to add an offset.
> 
> There are several problems with this:
> 
> 	1. These offsets can be as large as 1023 bytes. Performing
> 	   memset() on them isn't exactly cheap, and this is done on
> 	   every syscall entry.
> 
> 	2. Architectures adding add_random_kstack_offset() to syscall
> 	   entry implemented in C require them to be 'noinstr' (e.g. see
> 	   x86 and s390). The potential problem here is that a call to
> 	   memset may occur, which is not noinstr.
> 
> A x86_64 defconfig kernel with Clang 11 and CONFIG_VMLINUX_VALIDATION shows:
> 
>  | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_syscall_64()+0x9d: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section
>  | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_int80_syscall_32()+0xab: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section
>  | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __do_fast_syscall_32()+0xe2: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section
>  | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: fixup_bad_iret()+0x2f: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section
> 
> Clang 14 (unreleased) will introduce a way to skip alloca initialization
> via __builtin_alloca_uninitialized() (https://reviews.llvm.org/D115440).
> 
> Constrain RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET to only be enabled if no stack
> auto-init is enabled, the compiler is GCC, or Clang is version 14+. Use
> __builtin_alloca_uninitialized() if the compiler provides it, as is done
> by Clang 14.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YbHTKUjEejZCLyhX@elver.google.com
> Fixes: 39218ff4c625 ("stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall")
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

One comment below.

> ---
>  arch/Kconfig                     |  1 +
>  include/linux/randomize_kstack.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 2cde48d9b77c..c5b50bfe31c1 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -1163,6 +1163,7 @@ config RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
>  	bool "Support for randomizing kernel stack offset on syscall entry" if EXPERT
>  	default y
>  	depends on HAVE_ARCH_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
> +	depends on INIT_STACK_NONE || !CC_IS_CLANG || CLANG_VERSION >= 140000
>  	help
>  	  The kernel stack offset can be randomized (after pt_regs) by
>  	  roughly 5 bits of entropy, frustrating memory corruption
> diff --git a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> index 91f1b990a3c3..5c711d73ed10 100644
> --- a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> +++ b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> @@ -17,8 +17,18 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u32, kstack_offset);
>   * alignment. Also, since this use is being explicitly masked to a max of
>   * 10 bits, stack-clash style attacks are unlikely. For more details see
>   * "VLAs" in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> + *
> + * The normal alloca() can be initialized with INIT_STACK_ALL. Initializing the
> + * unused area on each syscall entry is expensive, and generating an implicit
> + * call to memset() may also be problematic (such as in noinstr functions).
> + * Therefore, if the compiler provides it, use the "uninitialized" variant.
>   */
> -void *__builtin_alloca(size_t size);

Is it okay to remove the declaration? Why was it even added in the first
place (Kees)?

> +#if __has_builtin(__builtin_alloca_uninitialized)
> +#define __kstack_alloca __builtin_alloca_uninitialized
> +#else
> +#define __kstack_alloca __builtin_alloca
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * Use, at most, 10 bits of entropy. We explicitly cap this to keep the
>   * "VLA" from being unbounded (see above). 10 bits leaves enough room for
> @@ -37,7 +47,7 @@ void *__builtin_alloca(size_t size);
>  	if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT,	\
>  				&randomize_kstack_offset)) {		\
>  		u32 offset = raw_cpu_read(kstack_offset);		\
> -		u8 *ptr = __builtin_alloca(KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(offset));	\
> +		u8 *ptr = __kstack_alloca(KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(offset));	\
>  		/* Keep allocation even after "ptr" loses scope. */	\
>  		asm volatile("" :: "r"(ptr) : "memory");		\
>  	}								\
> -- 
> 2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
> 
>