[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2579c500-549f-ff04-d1e1-6cf3db10b428@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:27:49 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, paolo.valente@...aro.org,
jack@...e.cz, tj@...nel.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block, bfq: minor cleanup and fix
On 1/28/22 7:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 11:23:51 +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Chagnes in v2:
>> - add comment in patch 2
>> - remove patch 4, since the problem do not exist.
>>
>> Yu Kuai (3):
>> block, bfq: cleanup bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg()
>> block, bfq: avoid moving bfqq to it's parent bfqg
>> block, bfq: don't move oom_bfqq
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/3] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg()
> commit: a9c77f6ec0b566439182a10b64dd3e60a0408849
> [2/3] block, bfq: avoid moving bfqq to it's parent bfqg
> commit: 36ad7fe0ec7485ee435f7a40452c7a58598779d4
> [3/3] block, bfq: don't move oom_bfqq
> commit: a0b98e6fba18a40aa9672cc3e0abf980456f3ae6
For all those pings, this patchset sure didn't see a lot of compiles:
block/bfq-cgroup.c: In function ‘bfq_bfqq_move’:
block/bfq-cgroup.c:648:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bfq_group’; did you mean ‘bfqq_group’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
648 | struct bfq_group *old_parent = bfq_group(bfqq);
| ^~~~~~~~~
| bfqq_group
block/bfq-cgroup.c:648:40: error: initialization of ‘struct bfq_group *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:288: block/bfq-cgroup.o] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:1831: block] Error 2
Dropped.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists