[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:32:03 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define
support for name based regulators
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:27:35PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> Name based SCMI regulator specification helps ensure that an SCMI
> agent doesn't need to be aware of the numbering scheme used for
What is a "SCMI agent" in this context? This is changing how the DT
bindings are specified, at some point things are going to need to be
hard coded.
> + regulator-name: true
> +
> + anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - reg
> + - required:
> + - regulator-name
This is abusing the existing regulator-name property which is there to
allow a human readable descriptive string to be attached to a regulator.
It should have no effect other than being included in diagnostic output.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists