[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220128163948.721c8b12@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:48 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time
sorting
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:11:39 -0500
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> wrote:
> The bisect finally landed on:
>
> 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777 is the first bad commit
> commit 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777
> Author: Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Date: Sun Dec 12 19:33:58 2021 +0800
>
> scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init
>
> and I can confirm that your updates today in "[for-linus][PATCH 00/10]
> tracing: Fixes for 5.17-rc1" fix or avoid the issue. I just wanted to
> add my report in case this adds any future complications for mcount
> build time sorting. Let me know if any additional tests would be
> helpful.
Thanks for letting me know. That patch set has already landed in Linus's
tree.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists