linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: hdmi-codec: Fix OOB memory accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164341360910.694662.2417882289675781544.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 23:46:49 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: hdmi-codec: Fix OOB memory accesses

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 22:50:39 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Correct size of iec_status array by changing it to the size of status
> array of the struct snd_aes_iec958. This fixes out-of-bounds slab
> read accesses made by memcpy() of the hdmi-codec driver. This problem
> is reported by KASAN.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: hdmi-codec: Fix OOB memory accesses
      commit: 06feec6005c9d9500cd286ec440aabf8b2ddd94d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark