[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc80a6e7-bd44-3b3e-fca2-1316a76d65f5@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:55:01 +0530
From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mdalam@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: qcom_nandc: Don't clear_bam_transaction
on READID
Hi Miquel,
On 1/26/2022 4:12 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Mani,
>
> mani@...nel.org wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:03:16 +0530:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> miquel.raynal@...tlin.com wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:27:18 +0100:
>>>
>>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>>
>>>> konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:44:26 +0100:
>>>>
>>>>> While I have absolutely 0 idea why and how, running clear_bam_transaction
>>>>> when READID is issued makes the DMA totally clog up and refuse to function
>>>>> at all on mdm9607. In fact, it is so bad that all the data gets garbled
>>>>> and after a short while in the nand probe flow, the CPU decides that
>>>>> sepuku is the only option.
>>>>>
>>>>> Removing _READID from the if condition makes it work like a charm, I can
>>>>> read data and mount partitions without a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This is totally just an observation which took me an inhumane amount of
>>>>> debug prints to find.. perhaps there's a better reason behind this, but
>>>>> I can't seem to find any answers.. Therefore, this is a BIG RFC!
>>>> I'm adding two people from codeaurora who worked a lot on this driver.
>>>> Hopefully they will have an idea :)
>>> Sadre, I've spent a significant amount of time reviewing your patches,
>>> now it's your turn to not take a month to answer to your peers
>>> proposals.
>>>
>>> Please help reviewing this patch.
>>>
>> Sorry. I was hoping that Qcom folks would chime in as I don't have any idea
>> about the mdm9607 platform. It could be that the mail server migration from
>> codeaurora to quicinc put a barrier here.
>>
>> Let me ping them internally.
> Oh, ok, I didn't know. Thanks!
Sorry Miquel, somehow we did not get this email in our inbox.
Thanks to Mani for pinging us, we will test this up today and get back.
Regards,
Sricharan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists